Legal Opinion
Gilman v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 28, 2001No. Civ. A. 99-30224-MAPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 17)
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman, dated April 23, 2001 (Docket No. 27) recommending that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 17) be denied, is hereby ADOPTED. Although the state of the law is not crystal clear, the Magistrate Judge’s assessment seems the most reasonable. The better view of this developing area of the law supports the Magistrate Judge’s interpretation of the impact of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mulloy v. Acushnet CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Canfield v. CON-WAY FREIGHT, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Gauthier v. Sunhealth Specialty Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008