State v. Williams
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.
This appeal involves the same condemnation proceedings as State v. Williams (No. 28134), reported ante p. 1. As Lucia Rose and her husband were the respondents in that case, for convenience, we shall hereinafter refer to it as the Rose case. The earlier opinion sets forth a full statement of facts, which we shall supplement here only to the extent necessary to present the circumstances peculiar to the case at bar. The Rose case was tried to a jury, and this case was later tried to the court. The state appealed from the judgment awarding compensation and damages to the landowners, Rose C. T.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Juby v. CraddockMontana Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cochran v. Harrison Memorial HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Sutton v. MathewsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Tomlinson v. BeanWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Brougham v. SwarvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.