Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Kalwall Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 18, 1980No. 80-119PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case raises the question whether discovery may be had against a third party when no litigation is pending and, if so, under what conditions.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant for about three months prior to a job-related injury in December 1974, for which she received workmen’s compensation. No claim for damages may be brought by her against her employer by virtue of RSA 281:12 (Supp. 1979).

The plaintiff seeks to pursue a possible third-party claim against the unknown manufacturer and/or designer of the oven that she asserts caused her injuries. In her petition for discovery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lefebvre v. Somersworth Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  3. Therrien v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fitz v. CoutinhoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Robbins v. SeekampSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Scarborough v. R.T.P. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Gutbier v. Hannaford Bros.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API