Lefebvre v. Somersworth Shoe Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
It is true that the records of the analyses referred to in the order against the Division of Industrial Hygiene were not made for the purpose of furnishing information to the public as a whole and are not public records in that sense. “It has been held that there is no general right of inspection of records of executive departments of the government which are not intended as notice, but are kept merely as evidence of the transactions in the departments.” 45 Am. Jur. 429. In order to make the inspection desired the plaintiff must establish her equitable right.
In a bill or on a motion for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. ShaidWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Ex Parte FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Pottetti v. CliffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Menge v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Gordon v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Dolnack v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.