Legal Opinion

Gail E. Austin and Mary Heinen v. M&T Bank

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided December 14, 2023No. 02-23-00050-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00050-CV ___________________________ GAIL E. AUSTIN AND MARY HEINEN, Appellants V. M&T BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 78th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 187,262-B Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction This is a forcible-detainer case. Appellants Gail E. Austin and Mary Heinen appeal from a judgment awarding possession of the property at issue to Appellee M&T Bank. Appellants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Coinmach Corp. F/K/A Solon Automated Services, Inc. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Williams v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Isaac v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API