Legal Opinion
Eriksson v. Deer River Healthcare Center, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 18, 2014No. Civ. No. 13-647 (RHK/LIB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Dr. Peter Eriksson previously worked for Defendant Deer River Healthcare Center, Inc. (“DRHC”) as a family-practice physician. He commenced this action in March 2013, alleging that DRHC terminated his employment in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. Presently before the Court is DRHC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Motion.
BACKGROUND
The pertinent facts are undisputed. At all relevant times, DRHC operated a hospital…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eilen v. Minneapolis Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Metivier v. HaalandDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019