Legal Opinion
440 Co. v. Borough of Fort Lee
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 17, 1996No. Civil Action No. 93-4311PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LETTER OPINION ORIGINAL ON FILE WITH CLERK OF THE COURT
POLITAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Complaint of plaintiff 440 Company against defendants Borough of Fort Lee, the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Fort Lee, and defendant-intervenor Fort Lee Tenants’ Association, Inc. seeking a declaration that a municipal rent control ordinance is unconstitutional. A trial was held before the Court on October 9, 1996, and October 15, 1996. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that Ordinance 93-33A is CONSTITUTIONAL.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Borough of Fort Lee (“Fort…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Helmsley v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tyler v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- 440 Company v. Borough of Fort Lee, Mayor, Council of Borough of Fort Lee, Fort Lee Tenants' Association, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Tyler v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010