Legal Opinion
Brandon v. Outpost 24, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 10, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1188Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHAD BRANDON, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-1188 (TSC) OUTPOST 24, Inc., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Chad Brandon brings claims under the D.C. Human Rights Act against his former employer Outpost 24, Inc., and his former supervisor Paul Rowe. See Compl. ¶¶ 1–5, 48–110, ECF No. 1-1. Defendants now move to dismiss. See Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 4 (“MTD”). Because Brandon has failed to state any claims, the court will GRANT the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Outpost 24, Inc., is a company incorporated in Delaware with its…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.