Legal Opinion
Susko v. Borough of Belmar
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 22, 2019No. DOCKET NO. A-3059-16T2Published
1Opinion of the Court
REISNER, J.A.D.
*982*588In response to the physical and economic devastation wrought by Superstorm Sandy, the Borough of Belmar took, or planned to take, a series of actions that were inconsistent with a thirty-year-old but still binding court decision in Slocum v. Borough of Belmar, 238 N.J. Super. 179, 569 A.2d 312 (Law Div. 1989). The trial court found that the Borough improperly used funds derived from beach fees (beach funds) to settle non-beach related litigation; improperly deposited into the Borough's general fund certain donations raised through a campaign to help rebuild the boardwalk…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cesare v. CesareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.