Lee-Moore Oil Co. v. UNION OIL CO., ETC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GORDON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court for a determination of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, the Court concludes that the motion should, in part, be allowed.
On October 10, 1973, the plaintiff instituted this action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. In its complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had violated, and was continuing to violate, the antitrust laws. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and 14. In particular, the plaintiff has alleged that the defendant, consciously aware of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gweldon Lee Paschall v. Kansas City Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Lee-Moore Oil Company v. Union Oil Company of California, Lee-Moore Oil Company v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Dome Laboratories v. Farrell Ex Rel. FarrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Airport Car Rental Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Tillery v. District Court ex rel. Fifth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.