Legal Opinion

McCall Co. v. Kershbaum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1929No. Appeal 253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrigb, J.,

The defendant complained of the lower court entering judgment for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and striking off his counterclaim.

This suit is based on a written contract covering a period of years, by the terms of which the plaintiff was to furnish certain patterns, magazines, etc., to two stores owned by the defendant, located at Allentown and Easton. Plaintiff furnished the materials but the defendant failed to pay therefor. As a result, the plaintiff rescinded the contract and brought this action to recover the balance alleged to be due,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. O'Neil v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Boyle v. Breakwater Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. LenowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holladay v. FidlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Reinhardt v. 60th Street & Washington Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hare v. Denny, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API