Legal Opinion
Standard Distilling Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 20, 1910No. Gen. No. 15,278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action of contract. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max Eberhardt, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
January 14, 1905, defendant delivered to plaintiff and plaintiff accepted a certain written instrument signed by defendant, the material portions of which are as follows:
“This certifies that The Standard Distilling Co. of Cincinnati., Ohio, paid the Consolidated Adjustment Co. $350.00 for a three year service from this date, with all benefits and privileges of its business system in its various departments, and The Consolidated Adjustment Co. agrees to promptly and faithfully prosecute any arid all claims listed with it for adjustment under terms of this contract.
Guarantee.
This Company agrees…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayer v. DwinellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
- Dessert v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by5 opinions
- Srivastava v. Russell's Barbecue, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Perlman v. Westin Hotel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Barstow Stove Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Perlman v. Westin Hotel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987