Legal Opinion

Barstow Stove Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,676Published

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the conrt.

July 9, 1909, plaintiff in error, Barstow Stove Company, sued Consolidated Adjustment Company in the Municipal Court of Chicago upon a certain contract of guaranty in an action of the fourth class. The trial was without a jury, and the court entered judgment against plaintiff in error for costs and in bar of the action. The contract sued on is the following:

“Series AAX. No. 3532.

CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTMENT COMPANY.

79 Dearborn Street, Chicago.

Company’s Interest

Each Adjustment of over On Current Claims, 7 per $100.00,10 per cent. cent.

Ea…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mound City Distilling Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  2. Standard Distilling Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  3. Hinrichs v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API