Legal Opinion

Miller v. . Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This case was heard at last term, Miller v. Scott, 184 N. C., 556, upon an “agreed state of facts” wherein the will was construed and the facts are set out. This petition to rehear is not based upon averment of error in the opinion of the Court rendered upon the agreed statement of facts then appearing in the transcript of the record, but upon the allegation that material averments were inadvertently omitted in the agreed statement of facts. The petition to amend the original case as sent up by the addition of other facts is agreed to by" both' parties, and they ask judgment upon the facts,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herring v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Miller v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roane v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Weinstein v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Gorham v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API