Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Tara State Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1994No. A94A0308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Tara State Bank (the Bank) instituted suit against John Cunningham to recover on two demand notes. The trial court granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment and Cunningham appeals.

On November 21, 1989, Cunningham executed a promissory note and security agreement in favor of the Bank in the amount of $41,412.96. The security agreement listed a Cape Dory Cutter boat as collateral and provided that the agreement was given to “secure the payment and performance of each and every debt, liability and obligation of every type and description which Debtor may now or at any time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heath v. L. E. Schwartz & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Stone v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Jamison v. Button Gwinnett Savings Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yoh v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Allen v. Peachtree Airport Park Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. International Indemnity Co. v. Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Ferdinand v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Allen v. Peachtree Airport Park Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API