Legal Opinion

Yoh v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1998No. A97A2175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Edward and Alison Yoh reneged on their contract to sell their residence to Frank and Julie Daniel, even though the Daniels (with the consent of the Yohs) had substantially improved the home in anticipation of the sale. The Daniels then received their earnest *641money back, which cancelled the contract. A jury awarded the Daniels $6,250 in general damages and $5,000 in attorney fees based on claims of unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and conversion.

1. The Yohs first claim they were entitled to a new trial “because the actual damages awarded by the jury were greater than the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watson v. Sierra Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Regional Pacesetters, Inc. v. Halpern Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Stargate Software International, Inc. v. RumphCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Hogan v. OliveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Department of Transportation v. DriggersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cochran v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Terrence Davidson v. Onika MarajCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Langford v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Felker v. ChipleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Shamsai v. Coordinated Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API