Legal Opinion

Hale v. Southern Ry. Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1932No. 7 Div. 867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The counts of the complaint claimed damages for the destruction of plaintiff’s automobile, at a public crossing of defendant’s track in Cherokee county, by being struck by one of defendant’s locomotives. On the trial it was admitted that the only claim was for subsequent negligence. It appears from the evidence that plaintiff drove his automobile onto the defendant’s track at the crossing, without stopping, looking, and listening, and when it was well on the track the engine of the automobile “choked down” or went dead, leaving the car on defendant’s track in front of an on-coming locomotive.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Blackmon v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Connors-Weyman Steel Co. v. HarlessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. BessiereSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Haroutunian v. Boston & Maine Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API