Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Scroggins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 10, 1998No. 1970216PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted Nathaniel Scroggins's petition for certiorari review of a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming his conviction of capital murder for the shooting of Richard Fields. See Scroggins v. State, 727 So.2d 123 (Ala.Cr.App. 1997). The basis for granting review was to determine whether the State met its burden to establish that the only eyewitness in this capital murder case was "unavailable" to testify at trial, as that term is defined in Rule 804, Ala. R. Evid.; if he was, then his testimony at the preliminary hearing was admissible at trial. We reverse and remand.

Nathaniel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. United States v. Bernard S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Sharifi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Snyder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  5. Revis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API