Legal Opinion
Helicopters for Agric. v. Cnty. of Napa
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 18, 2019No. C 18-06124 WHAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William Alsup, United States District Judge *1038INTRODUCTION
In this action challenging a county ordinance regulating the use of helicopters for agricultural purposes, defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART .
STATEMENT
In June 2018, the voters of Napa County passed an initiative measure that restricted the use of helicopters for agricultural operations. The measure was soon adopted as Napa County Ordinance No. 2018-002 and included the following statement of purpose:
The people find that any proliferation of personal use airports or heliports would be inconsistent with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alo v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Alo v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Farnsworth v. Flagstaff, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Isaacson v. MayesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023