Farnsworth v. Flagstaff, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Joseph Farnsworth, et al., No. CV-19-08287-PCT-JAT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Flagstaff, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant City of Flagstaff’s (“Defendant Flagstaff”) 16 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. 1-3).1 (Doc. 18). The Motion has been 17 fully briefed. (Docs. 18, 27, 29). The Court now rules on the Motion (Doc. 18). 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 The following facts are either undisputed or recounted in the light most favorable 20 to Plaintiffs. See Wyler…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.