Legal Opinion

Gretton Limited v. Republic of Uzbekistan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 30, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1755Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRETTON LIMITED, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 18-1755 (JEB) REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Gretton Ltd. seeks to enforce a foreign arbitral award issued in Paris under

9 U.S.C. § 207

and the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention. Before addressing what it perceives as the infirmities of such award, Respondent Republic of Uzbekistan offers multiple challenges to the jurisdiction of this Court to even hear the matter.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API