State v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWoliheim, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The issue is whether evidence discovered during a warrantless search of defendant’s residence, after defendant regained consciousness from an apparent heroin overdose and denied drug use, is admissible under the “emergency exception” to the warrant requirement. We affirm.
We recite the facts in some detail as they were developed at the hearing on the motion to suppress. Police and an emergency medical team responded to a 9-1-1 call regarding a drug overdose. Officer Welp testified 1 that, generally, before…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Preble v. Centennial School Dist., No. 287Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.