Legal Opinion

Mike Arthur Hartsell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided June 30, 2004No. 10-03-00255-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on November 20, 2003. We denied the motion on December 10 because it was not signed by Appellant. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.2(a); McClain v. State, 17 S.W.3d 810, 311 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, no pet.) (per curiam).

Counsel stated in the motion that Appellant informed the trial court in a post-conviction indigence hearing that he no longer desired to pursue the appeal. In response to our December 10 ruling, Ap*234pellant’s counsel has attempted to obtain Appellant’s signature for the motion. Counsel states in an April 8 letter that…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of Corsicana Housing Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Arkansas Tech University v. LinkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Hendrix v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. in Re: Freestone Underground Storage, Inc., Ray Funderburk, and Nancy Funderburk, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
  2. Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  3. Derrick Gilbert v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2026
  4. In Re Swo, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. In re S.W.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API