Legal Opinion
Davis v. First Nat. Bank
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1916Published
From Linn: William Galloway, Judge. Cross-bill in equity by W. H. Davis and Worth Huston against the First National Bank of Albany, Oregoix, Alfred C. Schmitt and others. From á decree in favor of plaintiffs, the named defendants appealed. On respondent’s motion to dismiss appeal.
1Opinion
Modified December 4, 1917.
On the Merits.
(168 Pac. 929.)
Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean.
The defendant bank commenced an action against W. H. Davis and Worth Huston, plaintiffs, to recover upon a promissory note of which the following is a copy:
“Albany, Oregon, May 24, 1912.
“$11,261.50.
“On June 30, 1912, after date, without grace, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of • “The First National Bank of Albany, Oregon, Eleven Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-one 5-100 Dolo lars, with interest from date at the rate of 8 per cent per annum, with reasonable attorney’s fees, if suit…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bellinger v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Cellers v. MeachemOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- South Portland Land Co. v. MungerOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Lumbermen's Nat. Bank v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. JuryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.