Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Sheard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1908No. 7287PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for pierce county, Miller, J., entered December 2, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens.

1Per curiam

In this action sundry parties, by complaint and cross-complaint, sought to foreclose liens for labor and material against certain real property owned by the defendant William F. Sheard, and from a judgment in favor of the several lien claimants, Sheard and wife have appealed.

The respondents have interposed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the findings of fact and conclusions of law made and entered by the court are identical with the findings and conclusions proposed by the appellants. A comparison of the findings made and the proposed findings, as set forth in the appellants’ brief,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Forth Yakima v. ScudderWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Bickford v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gilmore v. H. W. Baker Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gottstein v. Seattle Lumber & Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Casale v. Housing Authority, City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. De Haven v. TomerWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hughes v. Boundary Gold Placers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. O'Loughlin v. O'LoughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API