Legal Opinion

Moore v. Aramark

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 10, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00147Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RICHAWNDA MOORE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:24-CV-147-KAC-JEM ) ARAMARK, and ) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the Rules of this Court on Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. 1] and Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Supporting Documentation (“Application”) [Doc. 2]. For the reasons more fully stated below, the Court GRANTS her Application [Doc. 2] and will therefore allow Plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API