Legal Opinion
Pendleton v. MacDonald, Highway Commissioner
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 21, 1938No. File #9558PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
This action has been brought agreeable to the provisions of section 270a of the Public Acts of 1931 (Cum. Sup. [1935] §530c) by which an affected person may appeal to the Superior Court from the act of the Highway Commissioner in reestablishing lost or uncertain boundary lines or limits of a state aid or trunk line highway.
The appellant owns a tract of land in the town of Preston on the southerly side of the Norwich'Westerly road. On May 31, 1932, the Highway Commissioner notified the appellant that he had reestablished the bounds of the road as it passed by her property. The Commissioner had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Wadsworth v. Town of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Fitch v. New York, Providence & Boston RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Makepeace v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Roberti v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996