Legal Opinion

Frantz v. Parke

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1986No. 15777PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Should an unwritten covenant not to compete be enforced? That is the central issue in this case. The issue has been raised by a chiropractor who sued to enforce an unwritten agreement purportedly barring competition for a period of five years. In a summary judgment, the district court held that such an agreement would violate Idaho’s one-year statute of frauds. We affirm.

We are asked to decide whether a possibility of death within one year takes the alleged agreement outside the statute of frauds; whether the statute is obviated by full or part performance of the agreement; and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Doyle v. DixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bob Daniels and Sons v. WeaverIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lettunich v. Key Bank National Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. General Auto Parts Co. v. Genuine Parts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sword v. SweetIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bybee v. IsaacIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Johnson v. McPheeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API