Legal Opinion
Durbin v. Bonanza Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1986No. 82CA1278PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BABCOCK, Judge.
Defendants, Bonanza Corporation and Marvin D. Hastings, personal representative of the estate of Max D. Hastings (Bonanza), appeal from the judgment of the trial court which determined a disputed boundary between contiguous tracts of land owned by Bonanza and plaintiffs, Charles L. and Mary Jo Durbin (the Dur-bins), and which awarded the Durbins a prescriptive easement over the Bonanza tract. Bonanza contends that the trial court erred procedurally in its determination of the disputed boundary and erred in its determination that Bonanza had failed to overcome a presumption of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kempter v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- People in Interest of SSTColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hithe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Westland Nursing Home, Inc. v. BensonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Nicholl v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Martinez v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- ge Condominium Association, Inc. v. Lo Viento Blanco, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Lobato v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.