Legal Opinion

Smith v. Copeland

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 24, 1990No. 04-89-00107-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUTTS, Justice.

This is an appeal from denial of a temporary injunction. Payton A. Smith, owner of Crystal Spa, a massage parlor, sought to enjoin enforcement of Bexar County regulations restricting the location of certain sexually oriented commercial enterprises. Smith sued Harlon Copeland, Sheriff of Bexar County and his employees, requesting that the Spa be allowed to remain in its present location and continue operation. In his sole point of error, appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion and erred in not issuing the temporary injunction. 1

Chapter 243 of the Local…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. LogueTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. City of Richardson v. KaplanTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Stansberry v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Arlington v. Centerfolds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. City of Argyle v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Hang on III, Inc. v. Gregg County, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  4. Grothues v. City of Helotes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. City of Argyle, Texas v. David Pierce, an Individual and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API