Legal Opinion

CALVERT v. SWINFORD

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 2016No. Case Number: 115165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.:

¶ 1 We retained this cause to address the dispositive issue of whether constructive notice imposed upon the grantors by the filing of a deed with the county clerk precludes this action as well. We hold it does pursuant to our decisions and the teachings of No. 114,957, Calvert v. Swinford, 2016 OK 100, 382 P.3d 1028, and No. 115,015, Calvert v. Swinford, 2016 OK 104, 382 P.3d 1039.

FACTS

¶ 2 The facts of this cause are essentially the same as our recent decision in 114,957, Calvert v. Swinford, 2016 OK 100, 382 P.3d 1028. However, this cause concerns the summary judgment granted in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Panhandle Royalty Co. v. FarniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SCOTT v. PETERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. SCOTT v. PETERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API