Legal Opinion

Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 1941No. Gen. No. 41,578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Mary Sowers and John Nelson asked leave to file an intervening petition on behalf of themselves and other gas customers of the Peoples Gas Light and Coke Co.; it alleged the gas company had collected from petitioners and others excessive charges for its services and that it should be required to pay interest at the legal rate upon such excessive charges. Leave to file this petition was denied by the circuit court, and Sowers and Nelson (hereafter called petitioners) appeal.

A short summary of this litigation is necessary. September 1, 1936, the gas company filed its complaint in the circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. SlatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. In Re Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Taylor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BD. OF ED. OF CHICAGO v. Chicago Teachers UnionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Wilson v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gromer Supermarket, Inc. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Marvin Oreck, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API