Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Capital District Transportation Authority & Planz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

*1500Respondent Ralph Planz worked for petitioner as a bus operator. Planz was a member of respondent Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1321, which was a party to a collective bargaining agreement (hereinafter CBA) with petitioner. When Planz had not returned to work more than a year after suffering an injury, petitioner terminated his employment under a provision of the CBA. Contending that a different clause of the provision applied and would prevent his termination at that time, Planz filed a grievance. After petitioner denied the grievance, respondents demanded arbitration of the dispute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. County of Chautauqua v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 1000New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In re the Arbitration between Vestal Central School District & Vestal Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York State Department of Labor v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API