Legal Opinion
Kaimowitz v. Howard
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-71714PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMORE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon two motions, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and defendants’ motion for assessment of costs and attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is denied, defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees is denied in part and granted in part, and defendants’ motion for costs is granted as modified.
I
In April of 1981, plaintiff Benita Kaimowitz filed suit against the Ann Arbor School District; the School Superintendent, Harry Howard; the Director of Personnel, Herbert Moyer; and the nine members of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Northcross v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- David DeMATTEIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Olga's Kitchen of Hayward, Inc. v. PapoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- Orshan v. MacChiarolaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Brown v. Fairleigh Dickinson UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.