Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1991No. CR-90-761PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Eric M. Blankenship, was convicted of burglary in the first degree and of attempted murder. He was sentenced under the Habitual Felony Offender Act to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The appellant raises two issues on appeal.

I

First the appellant argues that there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty of burglary and of attempted murder. Section 13A-7-5(a)(1), Code of Alabama 1975, states:

"(a) A person commits the crime of burglary in the first degree if he knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling with intent to commit a crime…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. United States v. Henry T. Lane, A/K/A Dutch, A/K/A Henry T, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  4. Elmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Moorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McMillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Ex Parte MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Gayle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Hilliard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API