Legal Opinion

Ballenger v. Houston

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1950No. 17279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

“Equity has jurisdiction in cases of par tition, whenever the remedy at law is insufficient, or peculiar circumstances render the proceeding in equity more suitable and just.” Code, § 85-1501. “Where matter of account against an insolvent cotenant for past profits of the land is involved, and where partition of the premises cannot be made without a sale, equity has jurisdiction to decree partition and account. The element of account and insolvency will give equity jurisdiction.” Lowe v. Burke, 79 Ga. 164, 165-66 (3 S. E. 449). See also Cates v. Duncan, 181 Ga. 686 (1) (183 S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Lowe v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Huff v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Mitchell v. GunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. SchallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Chambers v. SchallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. City of Warm Springs v. BullochSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Khimani v. Ruppenthal.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API