Legal Opinion
Town of Oyster Bay v. Kirkland
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 2012PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The Town of Oyster Bay has created zoning districts designed for “Golden Age Housing” (below-market-rate private housing for senior citizens) and “Next Generation Housing” (below-market-rate private housing for first-time home buyers), in which preference is given to buyers who are residents of the Town, and their parents and children, respectively. In 2009, the New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) filed an administrative complaint alleging that the Town’s actions “deny housing to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Town of Oyster Bay v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Berncolors-Poughkeepsie, Inc. v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by44 opinions
- Friedman v. RiceCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- NYCTL 2009-A Trust v. TsafatinosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- McFadden v. FondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Read v. Corning Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Shepherd v. MaddaloniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.