Legal Opinion
Marigliano v. New York Central Mut. Fire Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided October 2, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter P. Sweeney, J.
*1080The issue presented in this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits is how attorney’s fees should be calculated in an action that involves multiple assignors and the submission of multiple bills on different dates.
Factual Background:
The trial of this action was scheduled to begin on April 26, 2006. At that time, the parties entered into a written stipulation settling all aspects of the action except for the issue of attorney’s fees. Pursuant to the stipulation, defendant agreed to pay a specified portion of each of the 21 bills that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Medical Society v. SerioNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- MTR OF HERZOG v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Herzog v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Breen v. Cunard Lines Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LMK Psychological Services v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Alpha Chiropractic P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
- Marigliano v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
- Valley Stream Medical & Rehab, P.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
- Midwood Total Rehab. Medical, P.C v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York District Court · 2007