Marigliano v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shlomo S. Hagler, J.
Defendant New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company *767(NYCM) moves for an order “revising the attorney’s fees on plaintiffs judgment in the above captioned matter, pursuant to 11 NYCRR 65-3.10 and 65-4.6.” Plaintiff Adam Marigliano, LMT, opposes the motion.
Background
Plaintiff medical provider sought to recover the sum of $1,593.67 in first-party no-fault benefits assigned to him by defendant’s insureds. Defendant denied the claims based on lack of medical necessity, overlapping services, failure to bill services in accordance with the no-fault fee…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Oberly v. Bangs Ambulance, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Lincoln First Bank v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LMK Psychological Services v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- AP Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Allstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2010
- Prime Psychological Services, P.C. v. American Transit InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2008