Legal Opinion
State v. Rice
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1981No. 4777, 4778Published
1Opinion of the Court
626 P.2d 104 (1981)
STATE of Alaska, Petitioner,
v.
Wilder S. RICE and Cessna Finance Corporation, Respondents.
CESSNA FINANCE CORPORATION, Cross-Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Alaska, Wilder S. Rice, and United Bank of Alaska, Cross-Respondents.
Nos. 4777, 4778.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
April 10, 1981.
Sarah Elizabeth Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anchorage, and Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for petitioner/cross-respondent, State of Alaska.
Wilder S. Rice, pro se.
James R. Peterson, Burr, Pease & Kurtz, Inc., Anchorage, for respondent/cross-petitioner, Cessna Finance Corp.
Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., CONNOR,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.