Boatwright v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
A putative father appeals a jury’s finding that he was the father of a child born to the prosecutrix. His principal claim for error is that the mother was allowed to state that, in her opinion, he was the father of her child. We find no error here.
The mother of the child testified that she had intercourse with the putative father on one occasion during November, 1974, that this was the first time she had ever had intercourse, and as of the date of trial, she had never had intercourse with anyone other than the putative father.
The alleged father claims that in a paternity…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daniell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Daniell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Bembo v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- State v. GilesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
- Ex Parte BemboSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Tice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Naylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991