Legal Opinion

Van Hoozer v. Myers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 26, 1924No. 14121PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action arose before the county treasurer of Garvin county over the report of a tax ferret, who had been contracted with by the board of county commissioners of Garvin county to assist the officers of the county in the discovery of property not listed and assessed, which report to said county treasurer is as follows:

“Pauls Valley, Oklahoma,
"i i ’ “September 19, 1922.
“Hon. Joe F. Myers,
“County Treasurer Garvin County,

Pauls Valley, Oklahoma.

“Dear Sir;
“In compliance with section 7449, Revised Statutes of Oklahoma 1910, wherein it is provided that property discovered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gamble v. Patrick, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of Alleged Omitted Property of KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Milbourn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Seay v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Voigt v. HardestyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API