Legal Opinion
Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. Purolator Courier Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 25, 1985No. Civ. A. CA 3-84-2217-GPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FISH, District Judge.
The court has considered the motion for injunction in interpleader filed by the defendant and third party plaintiff Purolator Courier Corporation (“Purolator”), as well as the responses filed by the plaintiff Inter-first Bank Dallas, N.A. (“Interfirst”) and third party defendant Sally Leasing Company (“Sally”). After reviewing the pleadings on file herein, the court has concluded that this is not a proper action in inter-pleader.
Factual Summary
The motion seeks an order directing Purolator to deposit with the court an aircraft engine, number 657 233 D (“the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cory v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hugh Leroy Dunbar, Jr., A/K/A H. L. Dunbar v. United States of America, Defendants-Third Party J. Arthur Hawkesworth, Jr., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Lummis v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- General Electric Credit Corporation v. T. R. Grubbs, D/B/A T. R. Grubbs Tire & ApplianceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Catizone v. Memry Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Fresh America Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Alfa Financial Corp. v. KeyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Central National Bank of San Angelo v. Jones (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
- North American Marketing Corp. v. K. Gronbach & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.