Legal Opinion
Catizone v. Memry Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1995No. 91 Civ. 8023 (RLC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendants Memry Corp. (“Memry”) and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co. (“AST & T”) move for summary judgment on each count of plaintiffs complaint, with respect to their affirmative defense, and with respect to their counterclaim for interpleader. Defendant Neil E. Rogen moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs cause of action alleging that Rogen blocked the transfer of stock to plaintiff.
I. Background
Defendant Rogen founded defendant Mem-ry in 1981, and he served as the chairman of Memry’s board and an officer of Memry until October, 1986. In March, 1983,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Health-Chem Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Glenclova Investment Co. v. Trans-Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Thomas C. Thompson Sports, Inc. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank (In Re Turley)District Court, C.D. California · 1997
- Kathleen Carr v. Marietta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Yuen v. U.S. Stock Transfer Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.