Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Crenshaw

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1924No. 8520PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This is a direct application to this court for relief by habeas corpus from restraint under an order of the Honorable District Court of Hill County adjudging relator in contempt. That our conclusion may be understood we state the pertinent facts.

A criminal trial was in progress. It had been once before tried, a conviction had, followed by appeal and reversal. On the present trial counsel for the State made an objection to a question asked by relator, of counsel for the defense, who thereupon stated that the identical matter had been passed on by the Court of Criminal Appeals…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Ex Parte MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Craig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pueblo v. SusoniSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  3. Ex Parte PinkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Ex Parte SentellTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Ex parte Lastra ChárriezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API