Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Pink

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1988No. 69759PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

These proceedings involve a habeas corpus application. Applicant was found in contempt of court by the Hon. Albert Pruett, Judge of the 351st District Court on November 4, 1986, for a statement demonstrating disrespect for the court when he stated to a witness on cross-examination, “Isn’t it a fact, sir, that in the offense report that you got, that I can’t get to_” Punishment was assessed at seven days’ confinement in the Harris County jail. In the process of being removed from the courtroom applicant was asked by the court to designate one of the counsel as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Deramus v. ThorntonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ex Parte SalfenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Ex Parte EuresteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Ex Parte WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re BellTexas Special Court of Review · 1995
  3. Ex Parte GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Ex parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API