Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

John Moody v. Mich. Gaming Control Bd.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2017No. 16-2244/2369Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART

ALICE M. BATCHELDER,

Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority—albeit for different reasons—that the district court did not err by holding that there is a material dispute of fact over whether there was a constitutional violation on the drivers’ procedural due process claim. I part ways with the majority on its analysis of the Fifth Amendment claim and would affirm the district court’s grant of qualified immunity. Accordingly, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

I

I begin with the majority’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API