John Moody v. Mich. Gaming Control Bd.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART
ALICE M. BATCHELDER,
Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority—albeit for different reasons—that the district court did not err by holding that there is a material dispute of fact over whether there was a constitutional violation on the drivers’ procedural due process claim. I part ways with the majority on its analysis of the Fifth Amendment claim and would affirm the district court’s grant of qualified immunity. Accordingly, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.
I
I begin with the majority’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.