Legal Opinion
Eule v. Eule
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
Sec. 247.14, Stats., so far as material, reads:
“In addition to all other allegations, the complaint shall specifically allege whether or not an action for obtaining a divorce by either of the parties was or has been at any time commenced or pending in any other court, or before any judge thereof, in this state, or elsewhere.”
Paragraph 12 of the complaint alleges:
“That a prior action for a divorce was commenced in this court and was dismissed by the court in July of 1957.”
Appellant contends that the allegation fails to comply with the statutory requirement referred to above, and we agree.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pedrick v. First National Bank of RiponWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Straka v. LanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Lander v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Dibble v. DibbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bottomley v. BottomleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968