Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Bogert
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant and her husband purchased the property as tenants by the entirety subject to the present mortgage. They thereafter paid part of the principal debt and executed extension agreements as to the balance, the last of which, in 1938, was signed only by the husband. In 1939 the husband died, leaving a will which was thereafter admitted to probate. Defendant personally continued payments of interest which aggregated $750. Upon default in these installments and in the payment of taxes, the assignee of the mortgagee instituted this proceeding.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Johnson v. . ZinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Honeyman v. HananNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Karameros v. LutherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- In Re the Accounting of NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Lopez v. LopezSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- William J. White v. Archie ParnellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- In re the Estate of MischlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Chrysler First Business Credit Corp. v. KawaColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.