In Re the Accounting of Nichols
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
The appellants are trustees under the will of one Ralph E. Prime, deceased, and shall be referred to hereafter as trustees. Ralph E. Prime had been the holder of a bond and first mortgage. Payment of the bond had been assumed by William R Burrows by extension agreements entered into between him and trustees. Thereafter William F. Burrows died and his entire estate passed under his will to Leo Placid Burrows, his sole executor, legatee and devisee. The administration of William F. Burrows’ estate had not been completed nor had the proceeds been paid to Leo Placid Burrows when the latter died…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hauselt v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Erwin v. . LoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Glacius v. . FogelNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Rice v. . HarbesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jemzura v. JemzuraNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Seamen's Bank for Savings v. SmadbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- Bayside-Flushing Gardens, Inc. v. BeuermannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1941
- In re BielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.